|
IBM Lotus Domino tunekrnl Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities
|
|
Secunia Advisory:
|
SA22724
|
|
|
Release Date:
|
2006-11-09
|
|
Last Update:
|
2006-11-10
|
|
Popularity:
|
6,727 views
|
|
|
Critical:
|
Less critical
|
|
Impact:
|
Privilege escalation
|
|
Where:
|
Local system
|
|
Solution Status:
|
Vendor Patch
|
|
| Software: | IBM Lotus Domino 6.x
IBM Lotus Domino 7.x
|
|
|
Subscribe:
|
Instant alerts on relevant vulnerabilities 
|
| | CVE reference: | CVE-2006-5818
|
|
Description:
Andrew Christensen has reported some vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Domino, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain escalated privileges.
The vulnerabilities are caused due to boundary errors in tunekrnl, which is setuid "root". This can be exploited to cause buffer overflows by passing overly long input to the program.
Successful exploitation allows execution of arbitrary code with "root" privileges.
The vulnerabilities are reported in versions 6.x and 7.x for Linux on zSeries and version 7.x for Linux on x86 platforms.
Solution:
Update to version 6.5.5 Fix Pack 2 (FP2) or 7.0.2.
Provided and/or discovered by:
Andrew Christensen, FortConsult.
Changelog:
2006-11-10: Added CVE reference.
Original Advisory:
IBM:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=463&uid=swg21249173
iDefense:
http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=440
|
|
|
Track this Secunia Advisory
|
Customers of the Secunia Vulnerability Intelligence solutions will automatically receive updates when new information regarding this advisory is released.
Read more about our Vulnerability Intelligence solutions and what they can do for you and your company.
|
|
|
About this Secunia Advisory
|
Please note: The information that this Secunia Advisory is based on comes from a third party unless stated otherwise.
Secunia collects, validates, and verifies all vulnerability reports issued by security research groups, vendors, and others.
|
|
|
10th Oct, 2008
|
New advisories:
|
15 |
|
New vulnerabilities:
|
83 |
|
Updated advisories:
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Solutions | More...
|
|
