|
IBM Lotus Domino Multiple Vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Secunia Advisory:
|
SA27321
|
|
|
Release Date:
|
2007-10-23
|
|
Last Update:
|
2008-01-10
|
|
|
Critical:
|
Moderately critical
|
|
Impact:
|
Exposure of sensitive information
System access
|
|
Where:
|
From remote
|
|
Solution Status:
|
Vendor Patch
|
|
| Software: | IBM Lotus Domino 6.x
IBM Lotus Domino 7.x
|
| | CVE reference: | CVE-2007-3510 (Secunia mirror)
CVE-2007-5700 (Secunia mirror)
CVE-2007-5701 (Secunia mirror)
|
|
|
Want to know the next time vulnerabilities are fixed in this product?
- Companies can be alerted via email and SMS! |
|
|
Description:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been reported in IBM Lotus Domino, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain knowledge of sensitive information and by malicious users to bypass certain security restrictions or compromise a vulnerable system.
1) An boundary error within the IMAP service when handling mailbox names can be exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow.
Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary code, but requires a valid user account.
2) An error in LotusScript when using the "Evaluate" method combined with certain @ formula commands to design views and agents may result in situations where a view or agent returns information that should not be accessible.
3) A security problem with Domino CA (Certificate Authority) process commands on the server console may result in passwords being displayed in clear text in the Admin panel and console.log when using uppercase characters with either the CA "activate" or "unlock" commands.
4) Insecure permissions on shared memory allows any local user to access memory containing other users' data.
Do you have this product installed on your home computer? Scan using the free Personal Software Inspector. Check if a vulnerable version is installed on computers in your corporate network, scan using the Network Software Inspector.
Solution:
Update to version 7.0.3 or 8.0.
Vulnerability #1 is also addressed in version 6.5.6 FP2 and 7.0.2 FP3.
Provided and/or discovered by:
The vendor credits:
1) Manuel Santamarina Suarez, reported via iDefense Labs.
2) Michael Gollmick
3) An unknown IBM customer.
4) Ollie Whitehouse, Symantec.
Changelog:
2007-10-25: Updated advisory based on additional information from iDefense Labs. Added additional link and CVE reference.
2007-10-30: Added CVE reference.
2008-01-10: Updated Solution with information about version 7.0.2 FP3.
Original Advisory:
IBM:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21270623
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21273266
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261095
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21257030
iDefense Labs:
http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=605
|
|
|
|
|
Please note: The information that this Secunia Advisory is based on comes from a third party unless stated otherwise.
Secunia collects, validates, and verifies all vulnerability reports issued by security research groups, vendors, and others.
|
|
|
|
33 Related Secunia Security Advisories, displaying 10
|
|
|
1. IBM Lotus Domino 6 Web Server Cross-Site Scripting and Buffer Overflow
|
|
2. IBM Lotus Domino Web Server Cross-Site Scripting and Buffer Overflow
|
|
3. IBM Lotus Domino Unspecified Denial of Service
|
|
4. IBM Lotus Domino Web Access Control ActiveX Control Multiple Vulnerabilities
|
|
5. IBM Lotus Domino Web Server Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
|
|
6. IBM Lotus Domino Unspecified Denial of Service Vulnerability
|
|
7. IBM Lotus Domino Agent Signature Verification Vulnerability
|
|
8. IBM Lotus Domino Script Insertion and Buffer Overflows
|
|
9. IBM Lotus Domino NRPC Information Disclosure
|
|
10. IBM Lotus Domino tunekrnl Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities
|
Show all related advisories
|
|
|
Send Feedback to Secunia
|
|
If you have new information regarding this Secunia advisory or a product in our database, please send it to us using either our web form or email us at vuln@secunia.com.
Ideas, suggestions, and other feedback are most welcome.
|
|
|
|
