Secunia
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relating to this vendor: Adobe Systems |
And, this specific program: Adobe Reader X 10.x |
| mtodorov | Adobe Acrobat 0-day vulnerability |
|---|---|
|
8th Dec, 2011 08:16 |
|
Ranking: 9 Posts: 128 User Since: 20th Mar, 2009 System Score: N/A Location: HR |
Hi, all! Since PSI reports this vulnerability also under "Secure Browsing" tab, are my fears of a drive-by install through Adobe Reader browser plugin exaggerated? Thanks. mt -- "If a task is worth doing, it is worth doing right. If it is not worth doing well, it is not worth doing." -- Dr. Jack Hyles <>< |
| Maurice Joyce | RE: Adobe Acrobat 0-day vulnerability | ||||||||
|
8th Dec, 2011 09:38 | ||||||||
| Score: 10495 Posts: 8,057 User Since: 4th Jan 2009 System Score: 100% Location: UK |
This is worth a read & the hyperlinks within the bulletin. http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/12/attackers-hit-n... U can also join his blog & ask further questions or sign up to his RSS feed for updated information. -- Maurice Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS HP Intel Pentium i7 IE 10 for Windows 7 16GB RAM |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| mtodorov | RE: Adobe Acrobat 0-day vulnerability | ||||||||
|
8th Dec, 2011 10:40 | ||||||||
| Score: 9 Posts: 128 User Since: 20th Mar 2009 System Score: N/A Location: HR |
Good to hear from you, Maurice :-) Thx for the link. I will study it. mt -- "If a task is worth doing, it is worth doing right. If it is not worth doing well, it is not worth doing." -- Dr. Jack Hyles <>< |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| mtodorov | RE: Adobe Acrobat 0-day vulnerability | ||||||||
|
8th Dec, 2011 11:00 | ||||||||
| Score: 9 Posts: 128 User Since: 20th Mar 2009 System Score: N/A Location: HR |
Yes, it is so much Big Software to leave the 0-day hole unpatched until next quarterly security update on Jan, 10 just like last MS 0-day hole still awaits patch Tuesday. I don't say that some of my systems were broken because of it, but it makes coffee taste acid bitter tasteless in my mouth. -- "If a task is worth doing, it is worth doing right. If it is not worth doing well, it is not worth doing." -- Dr. Jack Hyles <>< |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Maurice Joyce | RE: Adobe Acrobat 0-day vulnerability | ||||||||
|
9th Dec, 2011 10:45 | ||||||||
| Score: 10495 Posts: 8,057 User Since: 4th Jan 2009 System Score: 100% Location: UK |
Another little Adobe gem here for U to mull over! http://secunia.com/advisories/product/38260/ -- Maurice Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS HP Intel Pentium i7 IE 10 for Windows 7 16GB RAM |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Anthony Wells | RE: Adobe Acrobat 0-day vulnerability | ||||||||
|
9th Dec, 2011 11:57 | ||||||||
| Score: 2324 Posts: 3,203 User Since: 19th Dec 2007 System Score: N/A Location: N/A Last edited on 9th Dec, 2011 12:01 |
Hi mt , Rather busy atm , but your concern about patching or "lack of" prompts me to mention "sandboxing" which is the basis behind Adobe ReaderX protected mode ; Google use it in their Chrome browser to reduce/minimise the access to your PC by the bad guys through "unpatched/vulnerable" Flash . I myself am a long time user of "Sandboxie" with much success , even if it is not for everyone . Have a look here (Chrome is mentioned) :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_(computer_security and here for Ian (Gizmo) Richards' excellent detailed advice :- http://www.techsupportalert.com/safe-surfing.php Not all sandboxes do the same thing :eg: that in Comodo's Firewall/Defense+ does a slightly different job . Happy reading . Take lots of care . Anthony EDIT***: the link goes to the main ref page , cannot get it to show "computer security :(( so scroll down to the specific ref . -- It always seems impossible until its done. Nelson Mandela |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Not a customer already?Learn more about how our market leading Vulnerability Management solutions can help you manage risk and ensure compliance. |