Secunia CSI7
Advisories
Research
Forums
Create Profile
Our Commitment
PSI
PSI API
CSI
OSI
xSI
Vulnerabilities
Programs
Open Discussions
My Threads
Create Thread
Statistics
About

Forum Thread: psi and smb console disagree

You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.

This thread was submitted in the following forum:
xSI

This thread has been marked as locked.
Steven_Shank psi and smb console disagree
Member 28th Mar, 2013 21:39
Ranking: 0
Posts: 6
User Since: 15th May, 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: N/A
I have a folder for making a pre-install windows Windows PE. they put in flash. I don't know how or if that can be changed. I assume I told PSI to ignore it, but PSI is not giving me any way to check or change that so PSI says I'm at 100%.

Console finds this a critical issue, however it is essentially impossible to fix as far as I can tell. Will simply changing the one file and copying a new one screw up the Windows Pre-Install in some way??

Is there a way in PSI to find the ignored programs?

E.Jeppesen RE: psi and smb console disagree
Secunia Official 2nd Apr, 2013 13:51
Score: 220
Posts: 618
User Since: 24th Nov 2008
System Score: N/A
Location: Copenhagen, DK
Last edited on 2nd Apr, 2013 13:55
Ignored programs are located at the bottom of the scan results in PSI 3. They will be greyed out in the SmallBusiness interface.
Steven_Shank RE: psi and smb console disagree
Member 2nd Apr, 2013 20:16
Score: 0
Posts: 6
User Since: 15th May 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: N/A
Yes. I have seen stuff there. So, I am showing nothing down there and my Secunia 3 is showing 100% -

So here is what is happening. I'll send you screen shots or whatever is you like and it would help.

The Flash (plugins etc) I use is updated and fine. My local Secunia finds 100%.

Additionally on the computer there is a c:\make_PE3 - which has ia64, x86, and amd64 subfolders a few subfolders below that there are windows\system32 folders etc within those. Those subfolders have macromedia folders with an old version of flash in them. So I have 3 version10 flashes on the computer that would be used if I made a Windows PE disk, but not otherwise.

The local Secunia does not report those. The Management console does. The management console claims an update is pending, but it does not update.

I had assumed I had told Secunia to ignore those folders. Perhaps even in version 2. But now this version is not showing them at all anywhere on the local machine.

Perhaps it has to do with the updating from V 2 to V3 not showing everything that was ignored?
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0
E.Jeppesen RE: psi and smb console disagree
Secunia Official 3rd Apr, 2013 09:27
Score: 220
Posts: 618
User Since: 24th Nov 2008
System Score: N/A
Location: Copenhagen, DK
Would you mind sending a few screenshots showing the details of what is detected in both the PSI and Smallbusiness interface? If so, please send them to support@secunia.com

This thread has been marked as locked.


 Products Solutions Customers Partner Resources Company
 
 Corporate
Vulnerability Intelligence Manager (VIM)
Corporate Software Inspector (CSI)
Consumer
Personal Software Inspector (PSI)
Online Software Inspector (OSI)
 Industry
Compliance
Technology
Integration
 Customers
Testimonials
 VARS
MSSP
Technology Partners
References
 Reports
Webinars
Events
 About us
Careers
Memberships
Newsroom


 
© 2002-2014 Secunia ApS - Rued Langgaards Vej 8, 4th floor, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark - +45 7020 5144
Terms & Conditions and Copyright - Privacy - Report Vulnerability - Disclaimer