Forum Thread: java.exe

You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.

This thread was submitted in the following forum:
Programs

Relating to this vendor:
Sun Microsystems
And, this specific program:
Oracle Java JDK 1.6.x / 6.x

This thread has been marked as locked.
aaloneft java.exe
Member 21st Jun, 2013 06:19
Ranking: 0
Posts: 2
User Since: 13th Nov, 2010
System Score: N/A
Location: CY
Just updated to the latest JDK 6. Why is java.exe shown as "updating" and why does it stay like that forever?
Thanks for any help.

mogs RE: java.exe
Expert Contributor 21st Jun, 2013 07:33
Score: 2265
Posts: 6,269
User Since: 22nd Apr 2009
System Score: 100%
Location: UK
Last edited on 21st Jun, 2013 07:45
@aaloneft

It could be that you have other previous/older versions of Java still present.
If you go to Control Panel...Add/Remove look for any Java entries Except the latest update....remove/delete them, and then carry out a full scan....that should fix it.

Regards........mogs.

--
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0
Maurice Joyce RE: java.exe
Handling Contributor 21st Jun, 2013 09:13
Score: 11919
Posts: 9,131
User Since: 4th Jan 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK
I am surprised PSI is trying to update JAVA 6. As far as I can see it is End of Life.

http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_6.xml?pri...

--
Maurice

Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS
HP Intel Pentium i7
IE 11 for Windows 7 SP1
16GB RAM
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0
omniplex RE: java.exe
Member 23rd Jun, 2013 20:07
Score: -1
Posts: 9
User Since: 21st Jan 2011
System Score: N/A
Location: DE
It's an odd situation. Registered users of Oracle products supporting or requiring Java 6 can get JRE 6u51-b11. For these customers with a paid support id. (a registration without support id. isn't good enough, I tested it) Java 6 is still alive and kicking.

Other users (excluding stubborn folks like me) should have been upgraded to Java 7 in spring, for these folks the last public Java 6 update (6u45-b06) is arguably "end of live". But we know that there were several security fixes in 6u51 and in the current Java 7, therefore 6u45 is actually "insecure" for most users, not only "obsolete".

Some Windows 2000 users might be at 6u45 based on a patched installer, because the normal installer didn't support Windows 2000 for about a year. Oddly PSI didn't detect this variant on my (virtual) Windows 2000 machine; just in case I submitted it. After all PSI can identify the 6u45 java.exe on Windows 7, it should also find it on Windows 2000.
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0
aaloneft RE: java.exe
Member 24th Jun, 2013 15:49
Score: 0
Posts: 2
User Since: 13th Nov 2010
System Score: N/A
Location: CY
Thanks for your comments and for the other users as well.
To this date, 3 days later, Secunia 3.0 still says updating!
Oracle's SQL Developer says "SQL Developer supports a minimum java version of 1.6.0_04 to a maximum java version less than 1.7." and it is for this that I need JDK 6. I can only suppose that Secunia's rules consider Java 6 and insecure and only deleting these executables will consider PC updated.
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0

This thread has been marked as locked.