Forum Thread: Windows XP Stays Vulnerable After December 2013 Patch Tuesday Cycle

You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.

This thread was submitted in the following forum:
Open Discussions

This thread has been marked as locked.
mogs Windows XP Stays Vulnerable After December 2013 Patch Tuesday Cycle
Member 11th Dec, 2013 14:05
Ranking:
Posts: 6,279
User Since: 22nd Apr, 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK


--

mogs RE: Windows XP Stays Vulnerable After December 2013 Patch Tuesday Cycle
Member 13th Dec, 2013 18:24
Score:
Posts: 6,279
User Since: 22nd Apr 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK
Last edited on 13th Dec, 2013 18:24


--
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0
mogs RE: Windows XP Stays Vulnerable After December 2013 Patch Tuesday Cycle
Member 16th Dec, 2013 07:09
Score:
Posts: 6,279
User Since: 22nd Apr 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK


--
Was this reply relevant?
+1
-1

PSIJB

RE: Windows XP Stays Vulnerable After December 2013 Patch Tuesday Cycle
[+]
This reply has been deleted
mogs RE: Windows XP Stays Vulnerable After December 2013 Patch Tuesday Cycle
Member 19th Dec, 2013 20:36
Score:
Posts: 6,279
User Since: 22nd Apr 2009
System Score: N/A
Location: UK
Windows XP: The state of third party security

Summary: If you're going to stick with XP when security updates from Microsoft are gone, your security software will become more crucial than ever. Which are best?

By Larry Seltzer for Zero Day | December 19, 2013 -- 15:05 GMT

Markus Selinger of independent test lab AV-Test has written a warning about the impending end of Windows XP security updates and summarizing their most recent test results for third party security suites for that operating system.

The useful parts of Selinger's analysis focus on the test data, part of which is embedded below.** If users are going to stick with Windows XP past the support end date of April 8, 2014, then the quality of your security suite is crucial. Because there will certainly be new vulnerabilities in Windows XP that will remain unpatched you'll need other protections to keep them away from your computer. A quality security suite can provide these.

Selinger notes that the free options for Windows XP security are not the very best ones. The best of the free solutions, AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition, came close to the top, but G Data, Avira, BitDefender and especially Kaspersky's subscription products did better.

The detection rates of protection packages when tested using Windows XP: The products' detection rates in the real-world test are particularly important because they reflect their ability to detect brand-new attackers (as shown in the test results from Sept/Oct 2013 using Windows XP)

Selinger criticizes Microsoft heavily for abandoning XP users, a position with which I must disagree. Microsoft has been supporting XP for 12 years, far longer than any other vendor supports any other software product, and the core of the OS simply can't be securited to the degree that newer versions can. His point about Windows 8 usage share being (according to statistika.com) only 9% compared to XP's 21% misses the point that Windows 8 is relatively new and it's share is rising while XP's is dropping.

In fact, while you should secure your Windows XP system as best you can if you keep running it past April, you would be better off moving to a newer version of Windows, either Windows 7 or Windows 8

**
See the comparison chart at :-
http://www.zdnet.com/windows-xp-the-state-of-third...


--
Was this reply relevant?
+0
-0

This thread has been marked as locked.