Forum Thread: OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities

You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.

This thread was submitted in the following forum:
Vulnerabilities

See the original Secunia advisory:
OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities

This thread has been marked as locked.
Secunia OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Secunia Official 18th Feb, 2010 17:33
Ranking: 0
Posts: 0
User Since: -
System Score: -
Location: Copenhagen, DK
Some vulnerabilities have been reported in OpenOffice.org, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions, conduct spoofing attacks, or compromise a user's system.

1) The included libxml2 library fails to properly verify signatures.

This is related to:
SA21709

2) An error in the included libxmlsec library can be exploited to potentially forge a valid signature.

For more information:
SA35854

3) An error in the included MSVC Runtime package can be exploited to bypass certain security features.

For more information see vulnerability #2 in:
SA35967

4) An error in the processing XPM files can be exploited to potentially execute arbitrary code.

5) An error in the processing GIF files can be exploited to potentially execute arbitrary code.

6) An error in the processing of Word documents can be exploited to potentially execute arbitrary code.

PSIforTW

RE: OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities
[+]
This reply has been minimised due to a negative Relevancy Score.

Anthony Wells

RE: OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities
[+]
This reply has been minimised due to a negative Relevancy Score.

PSIforTW

RE: OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities
[+]
This reply has been minimised due to a negative Relevancy Score.

metaed

RE: OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities
[+]
This reply has been minimised due to a negative Relevancy Score.

Anthony Wells

RE: OpenOffice.org 3 Multiple Vulnerabilities
[+]
This reply has been minimised due to a negative Relevancy Score.

This thread has been marked as locked.