Secunia
Login
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Thread: Flash 10,3,180,42
You are currently viewing a forum thread in the Secunia Community Forum. Please note that opinions expressed here are not of Secunia but solely reflect those of the user who wrote it.This thread was submitted in the following forum:
Programs
|
Relating to this vendor: Adobe Systems |
And, this specific program: Adobe Flash Player 10.x |
| russraine | Flash 10,3,180,42 |
|---|---|
 |
18th Apr, 2011 20:36 |
|
Ranking: 0 Posts: 8 User Since: 30th Sep, 2008 System Score: 97% Location: UK |
Hey there, Been searching the Google's to see if Flash 10,3,180,42 (beta) suffers from the recent 0 day exploit or not. It was released prior to the exploit so I'm guessing it does, but currently it's listed as safe on PSI and I can't find any more info. If you have any more info, please do share. Cheers -- Windows 7 x64 Core 2 Quad 4 Gigs Ram 1 Mouse 1 Keyboard etc |
Post "RE: Flash 10,3,180,42" has been selected as an answer.
| Maurice Joyce | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
18th Apr, 2011 20:41 | ||||||||
| Score: 10510 Posts: 8,072 User Since: 4th Jan 2009 System Score: 100% Location: UK |
Are U sure it is showing as secure in the Secure Browsing Section? I saw it on a PC today that said it was secure in the Scanned Programme Section but not secure in Secure Browsing. -- Maurice Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS HP Intel Pentium i7 IE 10 for Windows 7 16GB RAM |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| russraine | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
|
18th Apr, 2011 20:48 | ||||||||
| Score: 0 Posts: 8 User Since: 30th Sep 2008 System Score: 97% Location: UK Last edited on 18th Apr, 2011 20:50 |
Yup - I'm fully secure in both sections. I have Flash 10.3 for IE and Other browsers installed. I would show you a screenshot but can't see the option here. --edit did a scan and Safari for Windows is listed as vulnerable, but it is the latest version. -- Windows 7 x64 Core 2 Quad 4 Gigs Ram 1 Mouse 1 Keyboard etc |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Maurice Joyce | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
|
18th Apr, 2011 20:52 | ||||||||
| Score: 10510 Posts: 8,072 User Since: 4th Jan 2009 System Score: 100% Location: UK |
If it showing secure in both sections then Secunia are saying it is registered on their database & that version is secure. I will upload it & give it a whirl to double check for U. -- Maurice Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS HP Intel Pentium i7 IE 10 for Windows 7 16GB RAM |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| russraine | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
|
18th Apr, 2011 20:56 | ||||||||
| Score: 0 Posts: 8 User Since: 30th Sep 2008 System Score: 97% Location: UK Last edited on 18th Apr, 2011 21:01 |
Alrighty then - here's a link to the Adobe Page http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplatformru... Not that you should trust links from strangers :-D It's showing my security status as 97% on the left but PSI says 100% - must be a delay in the update to the site.. -- Windows 7 x64 Core 2 Quad 4 Gigs Ram 1 Mouse 1 Keyboard etc |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Maurice Joyce | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
|
18th Apr, 2011 21:07 | ||||||||
| Score: 10510 Posts: 8,072 User Since: 4th Jan 2009 System Score: 100% Location: UK |
U locked the thread! I have reopened it. The latest Beta is 10.3.180.65 - It is that one I saw that was showing as vulnerable in the PSI Secure Browsing Section. That should not be taken too seriously - PSI does not normally monitor BETA versions. Personally in these uncertain times with Flash I would revert back to the stable version released on the 14th April. That said, if PSI is showing version 10.3.180.42 as secure in the Browser Section U could just leave it. -- Maurice Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS HP Intel Pentium i7 IE 10 for Windows 7 16GB RAM |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| russraine | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
|
18th Apr, 2011 21:10 | ||||||||
| Score: 0 Posts: 8 User Since: 30th Sep 2008 System Score: 97% Location: UK Last edited on 18th Apr, 2011 21:12 |
Hmmm, I had a look around Adobe and didn't see that it had changed from 42 to 65. Will update - always best to be on the latest - thanks! Mind you - could roll back to the latest 10.2 as you say.... decisions decisions. -- Windows 7 x64 Core 2 Quad 4 Gigs Ram 1 Mouse 1 Keyboard etc |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Maurice Joyce | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
|
18th Apr, 2011 21:19 | ||||||||
| Score: 10510 Posts: 8,072 User Since: 4th Jan 2009 System Score: 100% Location: UK |
I would roll back. PSI will tell U 10.3.180.65 is vulnerable - not sure that is true because,as previously stated,they do not normally asset track BETA versions. Hope this helps. Let me know when U want me to relock the thread - it will then prevent "tag on" posts & protect your mail box. -- Maurice Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit OS HP Intel Pentium i7 IE 10 for Windows 7 16GB RAM |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Anthony Wells | RE: Flash 10,3,180,42 | ||||||||
|
18th Apr, 2011 22:04 | ||||||||
| Score: 2324 Posts: 3,204 User Since: 19th Dec 2007 System Score: N/A Location: N/A Last edited on 18th Apr, 2011 22:16 |
Hi , Google Chrome browser Stable and Beta versions have patched/updated to their own 10.2. versions of Flash . The Dev Channel and Canary versions (updated/released since the Flash vulnerability was publicised) are both using the Beta 2 ...65 version of Flash ; in theory Chrome disables any insecure plug-ins and Flash remains enabled atm . Unfortunately the PSI does not track the non-stable versions of Chrome so I cannot "see" the PSI' response for any confirmation . I cannot find any other confirmation elsewhere . If in any doubt whatsoever , I would heavily endorse rolling back to a known secure version of Flash :ie: 10.2.159.1 ActiveX or NPAPI . EDIT: Actually , I just rechecked and the Canary is now showing version 10.3.181.5 which I cannot find listed anywhere ; whilst the Dev Channel is unchanged as 10.3.180.65 and still enabled ?!. Take care Anthony -- It always seems impossible until its done. Nelson Mandela |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
